Homosexuality : Not a mental illness by Dr Julie Hando, 27 April 2003 - Guyana


Transcripts of presentation made at a forum organised in Georgetown, Guyana on 27 April, 2003 to discuss “Sexual Orientation as a Fundamental Right”



Moderator : So we now go on to have Dr. Julie Hando. She’s
originally from Australia working in Guyana for the
last two years as a United Nations volunteer in the
Ministry of Health and now working in the
psychological clinic at the Georgetown Public
Hospital. Julie’s got a lot of experience in this area
and working with people and I am sure her contribution
on whether Homosexuality is a Mental Illness will be
one that will be quite interesting for us and maybe
will begin to address Ravi’s concern as well. I will be very interested to
hear that. Thank you.



Homosexuality a Mental Illness

Dr Julie Hando

Can I just first say how pleased I am that we have the
opportunity for this kind of open forum here in Guyana
which already occurs on a regular basis in many
countries around the world. So thank you for inviting
me Vidya to share in this discussion.

And today I would like to give you a brief
psychological and medical perspective on gay and
lesbian issues – homosexuality. Based partly on my
experience working in the psychiatric clinic here in
Georgetown but also over the years working in the
substance abuse field and HIV field in Australia,
working with gay people on these issues there.

So just to give you a bit of background, Sigmund
Freud, I don’t know if you have heard of him he’s
generally considered the grandfather of modern
psychology. And he asserted at the beginning of the
20th Century that homosexuality was nothing to be
afraid of, nor vice nor degradation

It cannot be classified as a illness. It’s a variation
of the sexual function. He acknowledged the many
highly respected individuals of ancient and modern
times who have been homosexuals. And he denounced the
great injustice caused by the persecution of
homosexuality and described this as a crime and a
cruelty.

However, as late as the 1960’s the medical field still
attempted to eliminate homosexuality, using things
such as electric shock treatment and nausea producing
drugs. Many other homosexuals have been subjected to
pschycoanalysis, castration, hormone treatment and
brain surgery to cure them of their supposed
unfortunate condition.

But do we actually know about the gay and lesbian
issue from the medical and psychological perspective?
What are the facts about homosexuality?

First of all, there has been some research in this
area so we can draw on these studies. And it is found
that homosexuality is relatively common and normal in
society. There are estimates that
people who identify as lesbians or gay men make up
about 10% of every population; regardless of ethnic
group, culture, social-economic status, religion or
occupation. Although studies in the general population
are limited, especially amongst women which may
explain why we know less about women than men. In some
studies up to 40% of men had a homosexual experience.
So it can be quite high in different populations. And
this suggests that consenting adult homosexual
relationships are a normal variation in humans and not
pathological; there are too many people that do it.

And this is supported by research where psychological
profiles of homosexual men could not be distinguished
by the psychological profile of heterosexual men when
rated by experts, independent experts. Other studies
also show that lesbians and gay men can be fully
functioning, well adjusted, healthy human beings that
do not differ from the heterosexual population.

Some research even shows that lesbians are more
self-confident than heterosexual women and that gay
men are less defensive than male heterosexuals.
There’s a body of literature on homosexual behaviour
(which says) that it is considered normal and
acceptable in many cultures, past and present. So the
second fact that we know about homosexuality or gay
and lesbian issues is when we look at the cause of
this behaviour that there is a genetic element in the
cause. It’s not necessarily just a result of
socialization. And this has been found in studies of
twins and suggests that it’s not simply environmental
or rearing practices and it’s not necessarily just a
lifestyle choice that some people make.

It’s source lies deep in human nature, it’s chosen not
given. Whether people relate with the same sex or a
different sex partner, it is the desire of all humans
to seek love and companionship with other people.

Third, we know that no treatments have ever been
successful in eliminating homosexuality. And as I
mentioned at the start, there’s been a lot of attempt
to do this, some quite inhumane.





In all but the rarest cases… {It can’t be changed, it
can only be suppressed. Treatment has caused physical
and psychological damage in some people as they
struggle to come to terms with their sexual identity.
Prayer, willpower have not helped either} – (Vidya,
this is from the tapes I collected from GBC I believe
it’s supposed to be here).

. [End of Side A of Tape one not sure what was
missed….beg.. of B….sexual orientation as a disorder
not homosexuality per se.]

In 1992 the World Health Organization International
Classifications of diseases followed suit also
dropping homosexuality as an illness. The American
Psychiatric Association no longer recommends treatment
to cure homosexuality and advises that medical
practitioners do not attempt to change an individual’s
sexual orientation.

So these messages are very clear.

The final point I would like to make is that cultural
influences are also an important part of how we
respond to gay and lesbian issues. We need to question
why homosexuality is such an emotionally charged issue
for some sections of society. There continues to be a
deep-seated ignorance, prejudice, and fear towards
homosexuality that is often reinforced by religious
beliefs and legal sanctions. The strong anxiety about
homosexuality suggests an underlying fear of
difference. A fear of difference seen in other
aspects of human social life including race, gender
(and) religious divisions around the world.

And while political and church factions can be loud
and opponents of homosexuality there suggestions to
people to change their homosexuality or accept
life-long secrecy, shame and celibacy do not seem so
humane or practical especially when you consider the
research findings.

And the implications of these cultural attitudes are
life threatening. For example, in my own country – in
Australia – there are high rates of youth suicide
among the gay community as vulnerable young people
struggle to come to terms with their sexual identity
in an environment that’s of pervading prejudicism and
ignorance.

The need for support groups and social research is a
priority especially in this era of HIV/AIDS;
especially in developing countries. We tend to know
and do a little bit more in other countries. So I
support the call for research, for further research,
social and medical.

Encouragingly, however, on a lighter note there has
been an increasing religious movement arguing against
the traditional biblical interpretations that condemn
homosexuality. Biblical scholars have examined the
original references and report that there has been a
lot of misconceptions and misrepresentations of
ancient words and phrases. From this research, they
conclude that the act of homosexuality is not in and
of itself immoral.

And progress has also been made within the law in the
past 30 years to rid the legal profession of prejudice
and discrimination against homosexuality. My next
speaker will be covering this in greater detail.

So basically we can see that there’s some research
already, particularly in other countries that provide
some guidelines as to how we can possibly approach
this on a more humanitarian, social level.
Medically, psychologically, the research findings are
very clear that homosexuality is not considered a
mental illness; a disease to be cured of. And I think
we should take these findings very seriously when we
consider the legal implications and the humanitarian
implications. Thank you.

 
Moderator: Thank you very much Julie. I think we all
found that very stimulating and full of useful facts
and information; particularly to back up her main
thesis about the issue of homosexuality not being some
kind of sickness or disease. She however has
underlined that in societies like Australia that there
is a great deal of fear and anxiety and discrimination
in those societies that perhaps have been documented
more than elsewhere. So I think we have an interesting
basis too for furthering our reflection and for
furthering the dialogue that we’re going to have at
the end.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turpentine mango madness

Re-writing Irfaan Ali's disgraceful statement after accepting his comrade's resignation

My experience with depression - Dr Raquel Thomas-Caesar